Category archives: Philosophy of science

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (4): From the “free market of ideas” to the “republic of science”

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (4): From the “free market of ideas” to the “republic of science”

Philosophy of science

By Jesús Zamora Bonilla

Traditionally, economics is not only about the optimisation of some magnitudes, be they utility, profits, wealth, or social welfare. Beyond the assumption that economic agents are rational beings who always try to make the best possible choice, there is the indisputable fact that the objects of economic research are social phenomena, that have to do […]

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (3): Epistemic utility approaches

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (3): Epistemic utility approaches

Philosophy of science

By Jesús Zamora Bonilla

Another route that has been followed to apply economic thinking to scientific methodology has consisted into trying to define a specific (‘cognitive’, or ‘epistemic’) utility function which rational scientific research should maximise. This has been the strategy of what is usually called cognitive decision theory , which is basically an adaptation of the Bayesian theory […]

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (2): Cost-benefit approaches to the growth of scientific knowledge

The Grand Bazaar of Wisdom (2): Cost-benefit approaches to the growth of scientific knowledge

EconomicsEpistemologyPhilosophy of science

By Jesús Zamora Bonilla

The first known application of modern economic techniques to solving epistemic problems in science was very explicit in describing the value of a scientific theory as the difference between ‘costs’ and ‘benefits’. I’m referring to Charles Sanders Peirce’s ‘Note of the Theory of the Economy of Research’, published in 1879, less than a decade after […]

Deflating truth (3)

Deflating truth (3)

Philosophy of science

By Jesús Zamora Bonilla

We saw in the second entry of this series that predicates like “…is true” have the following linguistic function: applied to an expression that designates a sentence X, they render a new (pro)sentence (“X is true”) that expresses exactly the same as the first proposition. This has lead some philosophers (not a majority, really) to […]

The Oxford Questions on the foundations of quantum mechanics

The Oxford Questions on the foundations of quantum mechanics

Philosophy of sciencePhysicsQuantum physics

By Daniel Manzano

Quantum mechanics and relativity constitute the two main revolutions in physics on the twentieth century. Furthermore, the counterintuitive character of quantum mechanics yields to a rich branch of different possible interpretations, and there are still many open questions. Not solving, but just defining these questions, was the main purpose of a conference entitled “Quantum physics […]

Selective ignorance in science

Selective ignorance in science

GeneticsPhilosophy of sciencePlant biology

By Silvia Román

There is a strong tendency to consider that every scientific or technical solution to a particular problem is irrefutable. Nowadays, scientific and technological knowledge usually eludes public criticism and even we have seen how important government decision making were made by the so-called technocrats . We often forget the contingency of this knowledge, the fact […]